~ VaYikra, 25:1-2.
On Mount Sinai. What has the matter of the Sabbatical
year to do with Mount Sinai? Were not all the commandments stated at Sinai?
Rather, this comes to teach that just as shemittah (the Sabbatical years), its
general rules, details, and specifications were said at Sinai, so too all the
mitzvos including their general rules and specifics.
~ Rashi, on VaYikra,
25:1
Rabbi Avrohom Davis explains, in his footnotes on this
Rashi, that it refers to a dispute in the Gemara (Chagigah 6a). Rabbi
Yishmoel asserts that only general rules were given at Sinai and the details
were presented in the Tent of Meeting. Rabbi Akiva asserts that both the
general rules and the specifics were given at Sinai, repeated in the Tent of
Meeting, and reiterated on the Plains of Moab. Rashi’s comment shows that he
agrees with Rabbi Akiva.
This Talmudic dispute raises a pressing, related question
for us: How much detail should a leader present to his/her followers when
advancing new policies or actions? There's one school of thought
that states that it’s more realistic to let people first absorb new concepts as
broad ideas and then follow up with details later, as needed. A contrary
approach, however, states that providing new concepts and sufficient (but not
overwhelming) detail will help dispel anxiety and uncertainty, allowing for
more expeditious actions by the people implementing the new policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment